Alimony not awarded unless dedication to family caused economic imbalance

 

Alimony Spain IncomeThe Supreme Court in Spain, has decided that in cases of divorce, the fact that one spouse earns more than the other does not give rise to the right to receive alimony where the reason for the difference in the salaries is not a result of the lower income spouse having dedicated more time to looking after the family.

The Court so decided in an appeal to a decision made in the High Court in Asturias where a wife was granted the use of the family home as well as a monthly alimony payment to last for a period of three years. The crux of the matter was the interpretation given by the Court to Article 97 of the Civil Code.

 

Factors to determine if alimony justified

According to the Court, Article 97 requires that, for alimony to be payable, the divorce or separation must produce an economic imbalance as between the spouses which then gives rise the right to a compensatory or alimony payment. To determine whether a disequilibrium has been caused, a number of factors previously discussed by the Supreme Court must be taken into account.

The purpose of Article 97, recalled the Court, was to ensure that any prejudicial impact which might arise from cohabitation should not impact solely on one of the spouses. To determine if this has happened, t is necessary to consider what has happened throughout the marriage such as dedication to the family on the part of one spouse, supporting the activities of the other spouse, the economic regimen specified in the marriage and even the spouses circumstances before they were married.

In the present case, the marriage did not prevent the wife from working and indeed she continued to do so. Nor did the marriage deprive her of career possibilities, which would suggest that she has the requisite qualifications and aptitude to lead an independent lifestyle from an economic point of view. Nor was it proved that the difference in income between the two spouses was directly caused by any sacrifice made by the wife during the marriage as a result of a greater dedication to the child and specifically as a result of her care of their child, now of legal age and financially independent with a job, nor that the increase in the husband’s income was a result of any such dedication.

 

Family Law Client Testimonials

Client reviews of our family law services, as uploaded by clients directly to the Wufoo survey platform:

  • Default Avatar75
    Liezl Pulido, Philippines
    Monday, April 23, 2018
    Rosa never stopped working very hard, she went way above what she needed to do...she never gave up on me and always did more than I thought anyone would.

    I am so blessed I got Rosa to help me I co...uldn't have gotten a better lawyer she's the best.

    Thank you Rosa from the bottom of my heart you are a wonderful person, I am so grateful to you.
  • Default Avatar75
    Julie Smith, Torrellano
    Friday, April 20, 2018
    I can't compliment my solicitor enough.

    From our initial meeting right through to my ultimate divorce (with no unpleasant surprises the entire duration of the entire process), he immediately respo...nded to my many enquiries, always had mine and my daughter's best interests at the forefront of any considerations and was well worth every penny of his extremely reasonable fee.

    Excellent value for money, totally approachable and very professional and understanding. I highly recommend him and will continue to retain his services for other matters in the future.
  • Default Avatar75
    David Pratt, Alhaurin del Grande
    Friday, April 13, 2018
    Alvaro gives me confidence that he understands the issue and gives me practical solutions. He works rapidly and efficiently. I would strongly recommend his services.
  • Default Avatar75
    John Burchell, Arroyo De la Miel
    Tuesday, March 20, 2018
    Alvaro was very professional, helpful and friendly. Understood things quickly. Explained things well in English. Very easy to contact at any time.
  • Default Avatar75
    Robert Davies, Mallorca
    Monday, March 12, 2018
    Very supportive and clear on producing a suitable divorce settlement. Efficient, understanding and professional.
  • Default Avatar75
    Adam Clark, Tenerife
    Friday, March 09, 2018
    Oliver was very professional. He explained things very clearly and honestly at all times and in the end we got the best result possible in my particular case.

    Many thanks to him for his high level ...of service.
  • Default Avatar75
    Holly, Lanzarote
    Friday, February 23, 2018
    The divorce process could have been explained more clearly and accurately so that a more realistic time for completion can be attained.
  • Default Avatar75
    Tamara Malcolm, Mallorca
    Tuesday, February 20, 2018
    Rosa was and is extremely knowledgeable and helpful. Her advice was excellent and i will definitely be using her expertise again in the future.
  • Default Avatar75
    Eric Van Der Straeten, Belgium
    Friday, November 17, 2017
    Mr. Sempere Gelardo was a pleasure to work with. This lawyer has an understanding of difficult matters that surpasses most of his colleagues.

    He replied to my demand the next day and in fluent Engl...ish assisted me in the case I presented to him.

    His professionalism, together with a lot of empathy, gave me a feeling of security. The results were of the same high standard.

    I can only thank him and would recommend him to anybody who is in need of legal assistance in the region of Alicante.
  • Default Avatar75
    S Smith, Estepona
    Tuesday, September 12, 2017
    Being English in Spain and fighting a child custody and divorce case here is extremely difficult.

    I originally had an only Spanish speaking lawyer and after 2 years of everything taking ages inclu...ding just responses from my lawyer plus with the language barrier I decided to make the difficult decision to change my lawyer to Alvaro.

    Immediately and quickly Alvaro got an understanding of the case and was able to advise me. I was now able to understand myself what was going on and he worked to a new pace that had previously been lacking and that was needed to win the case.

    Communication and response from Alvaro was always immediate and his recommendations were always correct. He is very professional and approachable person, and a very good lawyer. With his help and guidance I won the case and without any hesitation I would highly recommend Alvaro as a lawyer to anyone.
  • Default Avatar75
    Aaron L, Oregon
    Wednesday, August 02, 2017
    Very satisfied with the service provided. Helen was knowledgeable, helpful and responsive to communication. Will definitely use again.
  • Default Avatar75
    Maya M, Canada
    Monday, July 31, 2017
    My overall experience with Rosa was a positive one.

    Value for the money? Yes.

    In my opinion, Rosa is a very knowledgeable and professional lawyer, who is able to not only understand the situat...ion at hand, but also suggest different approaches and customized solutions for unique, non-standard situations, which was the case with me.

    And for that I am really happy and grateful to have worked with Rosa, and wish her the very best in the future.
  • Default Avatar75
    N. Gardiner, Mijas
    Friday, June 16, 2017
    Rosa was value for money, really easy to deal and very efficient. Highly recommend.
  • Default Avatar75
    D slocombe, Spain
    Friday, May 19, 2017
    Jose is very friendly and understanding. I am very satisfied and I would you use the same lawyer again in the future.
  • Default Avatar75
    KSC, Ireland
    Tuesday, October 18, 2016
    She was very helpful, always happy to assist. I was very satisfied with the service.
  • Default Avatar75
    Elena, Australia
    Tuesday, June 14, 2016
    Rosa was straightforward, friendly, polite and cheap. I was very satisfied and I definitely would use the same lawyer again in the future.
  • Default Avatar75
    Kate Godbehere, Granada
    Thursday, February 25, 2016
    From the outset, Rosa was extremely professional, approachable, efficient and competent. Her level of English is extraordinary, something very much appreciated as it made life easier for me during an ...inherently difficult time.

    Her correspondence was always relevant, detailed, simply and clearly explained and expressed. Rosa was kindly, matter of fact, calm, patient and always reassuring.
    Her pro-active, intelligent, thoughtful and knowledgeable advice helped very much during a particularly delicate and worrying stage of the process.
  • Default Avatar75
    Peter Gural, La Linea
    Thursday, October 08, 2015
    What I liked about this service: Value for money.

    The level of professionalism and excellence in service was not compromised in the reasonably low fee charged for the service.

    All details were... explained in a simple format that an ordinary citizen could understand, sparing the bureaucratic procedure that only lawyers can understand.
  • Default Avatar75
    Elena Todd, Almoradi
    Friday, July 18, 2014
    Our lawyer was very understanding of our situation, and took a lot of time to strategise for the best possible outcome.

    Her passionate performance in court exhibited a heartfelt commitment to our ...case.

    Her fees were very reasonable and she was willing to consider payment terms at difficult times.

    I strongly recommend her and will use her again in the future.
  • Default Avatar75
    Christine B., Spain
    Thursday, July 03, 2014
    Very fast and comprehensive responses to all my queries.

    Always available via email and telephone.

    Very reasonable fees.Extremely helpful and thorough. Polite, perfect English. Absolutely prof...essional.

Marriage not prejudicial

In summary, according to the Supreme Court, the marriage was not prejudicial to the wife, who continued to work, as she had done before and throughout the marriage, with the additional benefit of having been attributed the matrimonial home. Furthermore, the circumstances of each spouse when the relationship ended were more to do with her job than the loss of her capacity to work or any sacrifice that would have been made for the benefit of the other spouse.

The Court considered that the decision of the lower Court in Asturias to award alimony to the wife did not respect the doctrine that was espoused by the Supreme Court, on the contrary,  the decision actually converted alimony into a mechanism by which the wealth of each spouse would be equalised, disregarding the basic tenets of the doctrine. And it was for this reason that the Court, applying the doctrine referred to, that simple economic inequality between spouses, when not a consequence of a greater dedication to the family by one of them, does not in of itself give rise to an automatic right to receive alimony.

Request a Service

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

Select Office

   Image by ambro