- LeocriciaLeocricia has represented English-speaking clients in Gran Canaria since 1990. Now with over 20 years experience , she runs a multi-lingual, multi-disciplinary team of lawyers with offices in Las Palmas and Maspalomas. Services include Real Estate law, Contract Law, Inheritances, Debt Recovery, Medical Negligence and Tax & Fiscal Support to businesses.
A judgment by the Spanish Supreme Court, of the 25th of November, 2015, has invalidated as ‘usurious’ a contract for ‘revolving credit’ offered by a finance company that provided access to ‘Fast Loans’ with interest rates up to 24.6% APR (Annual Percentage Rate).
The appellant before the Supreme Court pleaded that their rights under the first paragraph of art. 1 of the Repression of Usury Act 1908 ( still in force) had been violated, The law states: “Any loan agreement that stipulates a significantly higher interest rate than normal and manifestly disproportionate to the specific circumstances or with conditions that render the contract unfair, where there is reason to believe that such an agreement has been accepted by the borrower as a result of being in a desperate situation,through their inexperience or their limited mental faculties.
Although the particular case under appeal was not truly a case involving a loan , but rather an example of a consumer credit that could have been arranged over the phone, such that loans are transferred to the borrower’s bank account or by using a card issued by the financial institution, the law was held to apply and, in particular, Article 1 since Article 9 states : ” the provisions of this Act shall apply to an operation substantially equivalent to a loan of money , whatever form the contract may take, and the guarantee of compliance upon which basis the loan has been offered.
The flexibility of the rules contained in the Repression of Usury Act 1908 has allowed the jurisprudence in this area to adapt the application of that law to new and diverse social and economic circumstances. In the case under appeal , those rules had to be applied to a credit transaction which , by by it’s nature , can be considered to lie within the ambit of consumer credit.
The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in its judgment of 25th November 2015 considered that the judgment appealed from the lower court infringed Article 1 of the Law of Repression of Usury in that the credit agreement must be considered usurious , as were present the two mentioned legal requirements.
A) The interest rate agreed was above the normal price of money. The interest rate stipulated in the agreement was in the order of 24.6% APR. Since pursuant to Article 315, second paragraph, of the Commercial Code “any payments to be made by the borrower shall be considered when calculating the interest rate”, the percentage to be taken into consideration in determining whether the interest rate is significantly higher than the normal cost of money is not the nominal rate , but rather the annual percentage rate (APR) , which is calculated taking into account any payments that the borrower has to make to the lender in respect of the loan, according to legally predetermined standards .
This extreme interpretation is essential (but not sufficient by itself) for the clause which establishes the rate of interest to be considered transparent , because not only does it permit a more clear understanding of the burden that the credit loan supposes to the borrower or creditor , but it also enables a more reliable comparison with loans offered by the competition.
The interest rate with which the comparison is to be made is that “normal for money ” . It is not , therefore, compared with the ‘legal’ interest rate , but with that interest rate that is “normal or usual, taking into account the circumstances of the case and the freedom existing in such matters ‘ interest (Case no. 869/2001 of 2nd October) . To establish what is considered “normal interest rates” reference may be made to statistics published by the Bank of Spain , and taking as a basis point the monthly information provided by credit institutions on the interest rates that are applied to various forms of lending (loans and personal loans up to one year and up to three years, mortgages with a term more than three years, current accounts, savings accounts, hire-purchase agreements, etc. ) .
That obligation held by the financial entities to provide information on the interest rates they charge has its origins in Article 5.1 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank ( ECB), which details the obligation of the latter, assisted by the national central banks , to collect information through statistical operators. To this end , the ECB adopted Regulation (EC ) No 63/2002 of 20 December 2001 on statistics relating to interest rates applied by monetary financial institutions to deposits and loans vis households and non-financial companies; and thereafter, the Bank of Spain , through its Circular 4/2002 of 25 June, provided the mandatory content of the Regulation, in order to obtain the information required from the credit institutions.
In the case under appeal , the judgment being reviewed had found as proven fact that the interest rate of 24.6 % APR – barely over double the normal average interest rate on consumer credit operations at the time when the contract was concluded – could not be criticized as excessive. However, the question is not whether or not it is excessive, but rather if it is ” significantly higher than the normal cost of money and manifestly disproportionate to the circumstances of the case ” and the 1st Chamber of the Supreme Court considered that a difference of this magnitude between the APR applied to this particular loan and the average interest rate on consumer loans on the date on which it was created, made it possible to consider that the interest should be stipulated as ” significantly higher than the normal cost of money.”
B ) So that the loan could be considered usury it is necessary that, besides being significantly higher than the normal cost of money, the stipulated interest must be “grossly disproportionate when the circumstances of the case are taken into consideration .”
As a matter of logic, since no test exists to determine that which is considered ‘normal’ it falls to be alleged and proven that there were exceptional circumstances that justified the ‘grossly disproportionate rate of interest’. The financial institution that granted the “revolving” loan did not justify the exceptional circumstances that explain the provision of a significantly higher interest than a standard loan in consumer credit.
Generally, the exceptional circumstances which may justify an abnormally high interest rate are related to the risk of the operation. When the borrower plans to use the loan for a particularly lucrative, but high risk, operation, it is justified that the person who finances it will , as well as having to run the risk, also benefit from the high profits expected by fixing the interest rate significantly higher than normal.
Consequences Of A Finding That Consumer Credit Has Is Usurious
The consequences of a finding that an offer of credit is usurious are as follows according to the judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court:
- The usurious “revolving” credit arrangement granted by the Bank entails that the contract is invalid and has been described by the 1st Chamber of TS as “total, absolute and complete”, and permits of no acceptance whatsoever because it is fatally irreparable , nor may the contract be susceptible to prescription, as a result of expiry of a long period of time, for example. “( STS no. 539/2009 , of July 14, 2009).
- The consequences of such invalidity are those laid down in Article 3 of the Law of Repression of Usury , that is, the borrower is obliged to return only the amount received. In the case under appeal , the defendant (lender) had actually paid the applicant (the borrower) a higher amount than he had received , so the complaint was completely dismissed. The lack of a prepared counterclaim prevented the application of the second part of the provision, according to which , if the borrower had only paid back part of the loan received including principal and interest due , the lender would have to return to the borrower any amount which exceeds the borrowed capital .
- As the defendant had paid an amount greater than that loaned to the applicant, it was not necessary to proceed to the return of interest on arrears, which meant it was unnecessary for the court to have to rule on the second ground of appeal , which raised a question that has already been settled by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court ( SSTS no. 265/2015 , of April 22 , and 469/2015 , of September 8 ). Moreover, the high court understood that such irresponsible lending practices, providing easy access to consumer loans, without properly studying guarantees provided by the borrower, but at much higher interest rates than normal in order to compensate for late payments, results in those who regularly meet their repayment obligations have to carry the burden for those who are unable to, and this cannot be protected by law”.
Below is a list of recent reviews received from our clients, obtained via the Wufoo client survey platform:
- David W Baker, MalagaTuesday, November 06, 2018We were extremely satisfied with Alvaro: He explained the law to us and gave us a solution to our problem. He could not have been more helpful and we will definitely use him again.
- Thom Koller, LondonMonday, November 05, 2018Francisca provided a perfect service!
She is professional, dedicated and took care to understand the needs of my situation. Her service offers exceptional value for money and gives complete peace o...f mind.
- Michael O'Sullivan, IbizaThursday, November 01, 2018Understanding Spanish law regarding buying and selling properties is a minefield for English speakers. Cristina provided the legal expertise, the translation of legal documents, explanations for all i...ssues, and solutions for our challenges.
Also, she provides confidence and reassurance that what we are doing is in our best interests and within the law - very important when working in a foreign country.
In summary, she is an excellent professional that we are so pleased we found and will continue to use for all our legal matters.
I think you have a perfect solution for supporting people abroad. I was lucky to find you on the internet. Perhaps you could promote your services to all estate agents abroad, so more people can get access to your service when buying or selling abroad.
- Colin Wilson, AustraliaTuesday, October 30, 2018Overall it was great. Rosa always answered all questions asked and provided clear, concise and well explained answers.
When there was a delay in responding she did offer an apology which was appre...ciated. Rosa always instilled a sense of confidence that she knew exactly what was going on, what I was asking, and what the applicable law was.
When not a Spanish local and dealing with her remotely, this provided great comfort in a sensitive matter.
- Campbell Reynolds, SpainMonday, October 22, 2018We were very satisfied with the service provided by our lawyer Sabela.
She was very accomodating, quick response to everything while thinking outside the box for solutions. Also, her English was mo...re or less fluent.
- David Edwards, EnglandWednesday, October 17, 2018Very Satisfied with the service provided by Oliver. He was quick, efficient and value for money. Would definitely recommend to friends.
- Andrew Morecroft, LubrinMonday, October 15, 2018Juan was extremely helpful during every part of the purchase. As I was buying an older property there were slight complications but Juan explained every issue and managed to work through the difficult...ies with supreme efficiency.
Also there was a ridiculous situation with my Spanish bank account where I could not access the money even though it was in the account. Thankfully I had given Juan power of attorney and he managed to sort-out the problem.
He went above and beyond the call of duty and I am very grateful for all his help. I would strongly recommend him to anyone looking to buy in the Almeria region.
- Manoochehr Jafari-Nahad, UAESaturday, October 13, 2018Jose-Antonio was extremely helpful and prompt and also it was helpful that he could be contacted via social media like Whatsapp
- Michele Jansen van Vuuren, BenajarafeSaturday, October 13, 2018Alvaro was extremely helpful, he couldn't have done more. Very quick to respond to my query.
Only issue was that some of the documents I needed to provide were not mentioned. However, would defini...tely recommend his services to friends.
- John Fraser Dunfield, San FranciscoFriday, October 12, 2018Good understanding. Applied sufficient pressure as needed to get the issue resolved. Reasonable charge for service provided. Would definitely recommend this service to friends.
- Rosemarie Byrne and John Cooper, Dublin IrelandcoupleTuesday, October 09, 2018We found Francisca extremely helpful with a great amount of knowledge about buying a house and re-locating to Spain.
- Jane Evanson, London, UKfemaleTuesday, October 09, 2018Francisco was very helpful and professional. I was very happy with the advice and service.
- David McChesney, Puerto BanusWednesday, October 03, 2018Alvaro was very professional, Knowledgeable of the subject at hand, did not over-charge - in fact cut costs in the best way for me. Very efficient in the entire process. Thank you.
- Martha Kimes, Scottsdale, Arizona USAfemaleTuesday, October 02, 2018Francisco was incredibly responsive (and quickly).
Unlike American attorneys (and I know, because I am one), he didn't even bill me for a few follow-up emails/calls that he made on my behalf which... he easily could have done.
I was supremely happy with his legal services.
- David Roots, EnglandMonday, October 01, 2018We were very satisfied with the service we received. Rosa dealt with the matter in hand promptly and efficiently.
- David Knors, BarcelonaWednesday, September 26, 2018Oscar was very kind, professional and fair. He was able to help me with my problem and he was very determined that he would.
Oscar is very competent, polite and showed a lot of effort to solve my ...problem. I strongly recommend him.
- Tauri, EstoniafemaleTuesday, September 25, 2018Very satisfied with the service. Francisco is bilingual English-Spanish and was always quick to respond and was very professional at all times.
- Mohamed kheder, Dublin, IrelandMonday, September 24, 2018Every thing was great ... Rosa was really helpful and understanding. And I see the value for money was good enough.. of course I would recommend it to any of my friends.
And I would like to have th...e chance to thank Rosa and the whole company for everything.
- Daniel Elias, New YorkTuesday, September 18, 2018Excellent service, delivered exactly as promised, and at half the cost a different translator had requested for the same project!
- Darren & Gemma Nesbitt, ValenciaTuesday, September 11, 2018Inmaculada has been of excellent service to us, as a family and in helping to set up a business in Spain. She has now undertaking several project for us and has delivered high quality on all of them. ...Perfect service!
- Patsy Valentin, GranadaTuesday, September 11, 2018Extremely accommodating and highly professional and very pro active. Excellent result and service. Highly recommended.
- Jovie, MalagaWednesday, September 05, 2018My lawyer Alvaro was extremely helpful and very efficient. I would definitely recommend his services to friends.
- Albert Roldan, FranceTuesday, September 04, 2018Alfonso was extremely helpful, particularly since we requested a quick turnaround for the 18 documents needing to be translated from English and French to Spanish.
He was fluent in our phone conver...sations and email correspondence, he never misunderstood what our requirements were. He was was clear in explaining how this process works and what the price included.
I would highly recommend him to anyone needing these services.
- David Grundy, UKFriday, August 24, 2018Jose was very polite and we received an excellent service from him. Nothing was to much trouble and his communication was 2nd to none. Highly recommended!
- Mario Klappholz, Miami, FloridaThursday, August 16, 2018Inma was very helpful, always happy to assist. I particularly appreciated her professionalism. I would not hesitate to recommend her services to friends.
- Daniel Spitzhorn, SpainTuesday, August 14, 2018Miguel in Oviedo helped us during the process of buying a flat in Asturias. He was just brilliant!
- Tracey Iliffe Bradley, UKfemaleTuesday, August 14, 2018Rosa dealt with everything efficiently and promptly and went beyond our expectations by helping us to open a Spanish bank account and deal with other minutiae.
- Erslaan Ahmed, BangladeshFriday, August 10, 2018Gave very good advice and provided an excellent solution. Inma is very professional in her work. I would recommend her services to friends.
- John Ryan, Derby, EnglandWednesday, August 08, 2018A perfect relationship between client and professional. Nothing was too much trouble.
Went over and above his job and more. I would only use his services if I need legal services. I were very lucky... to find Jose first time round.
Thank you jose
- Robert Brownlee, Almeria, SpainWednesday, August 08, 2018Everything was as it should be: excellent. Had to pay by bank transfer and maybe would have liked another means of paying.