Bank liable for couple’s losses on high risk investments

The Supreme Court has upheld an appeal from the High Court in Valencia, ruling in favour of a couple who alleged that the respondent Bank has made high risk investments on their behalf even though they had specified that they wanted only low risk investments.

BBVA bank was ordered to pay more than €290,000 to the couple in damages for making investments on their behalf in Lehman preferred stock under a contract that permitted the bank discretion to manage an investment portfolio on behalf of the couple.

The Court of first instance had upheld the couple’s claim on the basis that the bank had managed the investment portfolio in a negligent manner by failing to adjust the investment strategy to conform to the  low-risk profile of the clients. The High Court reversed this decision by finding that the bank had provided sufficient information to the couple that they could understand the proposed investment and because the relevant industry rules did not prevent conservative investors from making higher risk investments.

However, the Supreme Court, in reversing the decision of the regional High Court, decided that the risk profile of the bank’s clients and their investment preferences formed an integral part of the contract between the bank and the couple.

It was consequently the bank’s legal obligation to collect information from its clients regarding –

  1. their financial situation,
  2. their investment experience,
  3. the client’s financial objectives with regard to their investments, and
  4. to advise in a clear and transparent manner the risks associated with the investments such that the provision of deficient information could mean a negligence that would give rise to an indemnity for the losses occasioned.

In the circumstances before it, the Court considered that such clear and complete information was not provided by the bank nor had it acted in good faith, there being a contradiction between the risk profile of the client which was very low and that of the financial instruments in which the bank invested on their behalf, which was very high; such that, being diligent and acting in good faith, the situation would have demanded that the bank bring-up this inconsistency between risk appetite and the products being added to the portfolio so as to make sure that the information was clear and had been understood.

Accordingly, having not complied with this obligation, the bank was responsible for the losses suffered by their clients.

48 Lawyers Offering Services in Spain

Testimonials for Litigation
  • Bilal Ahmad
    Bilal Ahmad, Alicante

    Jose was a great advocate.

    Jul 30, 2019
  • Dean Hugues
    Dean Hugues, Catral, Alicante (Spain)

    Did the job I needed doing extremely well. Couldn't have asked for better service. Everything was spot on!

    Jul 09, 2019
  • Andy Docksey
    Andy Docksey, La Cala de Mijas

    Alvaro is very professional, he is very polite and helpful, he responds very quickly and I would definitely use his service again and recommend him to others.

    Jul 08, 2019
  • Max Henchy
    Max Henchy, Puerto Banus- Estepona

    He was very professional and extremely helpful! Also incredibly quick and efficient.

    Thanks to him my life has changed drastically for the better! He went out of his way to help me and my family.

    May 24, 2019
  • Angela Panuccio
    Angela Panuccio, Granada

    Alvaro was extremely helpful. I would recommend his services to others.

    May 23, 2019
  • Dane Beddall
    Dane Beddall, Palma de Mallorca

    Rosa was very professional and gave good advice, it was nice to meet such a nice lady.

    Apr 10, 2019
  • Sham Naib
    Sham Naib, Callao Salvaje, Tenerife

    My lawyer Oliver was very helpful, always happy to assist. He professionally checked the law before dispensing advice.

    May 18, 2018
  • Joy Ellis
    Joy Ellis, Sanxenxo

    Sabela was extremely professional in her dealings with us, very patient and understanding of the situation and gave very good advice and a good solution to our problem. She is bilingual.

    We feel very confident that she has dealt with the complaint against a third party and know that if we need any further assistance in this matter she will be more than able to resolve it for us.

    She responded immediately to our contact and arranged a meeting on site to enable us to explain fully the problem we had.

    May 01, 2018
  • Patrick Martel
    Patrick Martel, Canada

    For being in another country and all our back and forth communicating over emails .. I thought Rosa did a brilliant job.

    Thankfully she was able to help where no one else was willing ..

    Mar 07, 2018
  • Tomas M
    Tomas M, Czech Republic

    My lawyer Marcos had sufficient English and couldn't have done more to help. I would definitely use his services again.

    Nov 27, 2017
  • Richard McColvin
    Richard McColvin, Velez Blanco

    The lawyers were very professional and approachable and spoke excellent English.

    I felt that they provided good value for money also.

    Dec 20, 2016
  • Marina Ristic
    Marina Ristic, London

    Olga was responsive, understood the case and gave the right advice.

    Nov 28, 2016
  • Jill Clash
    Jill Clash, Lanzarote

    Found Erardo very helpful and understanding, felt very comfortable talking to him.

    Would definitely use his services again. Unfortunately after all the initial paperwork, payments, doctor and court visits the case was unable to go ahead as no-one was able to trace the owner of the premises where the incident occurred.

    Sep 13, 2016
Send Your Enquiry
Are there public holidays?

Enquiry sent. Thank you!

Please fix errors